Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

24 months ago, 24 months ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	55.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 720 - 32 Bit 色彩, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	9.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 10 '22 at 12:46
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 5320 2 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	74.2% Very good	Memory 67 1-Core 98.6 2-Core 219 70% 128 Pts	4-Core 435 8-Core 897 78% 666 Pts	64-Core 1,346 83% 1,346 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Tesla T4 176 User benchmarks, average bench 73% Nvidia(10DE 12A2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 15GB, Driver: 472.98 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.9% Above average	Lighting 60.7 Reflection 72.9 Parallax 74.5 50% 69.4 fps	MRender 71.8 Gravity 60.8 Splatting 65.2 54% 65.9 fps
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 80%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 215GB 96 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 109GB free Firmware: 2.5+ Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 2259 Write 2,323 Mixed 2,228 508% 2,270 MB/s	4K Read 52.4 4K Write 12.9 4K Mixed 41.1 139% 35.5 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 130 97% 127 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 64%
Qemu HARDDISK 322GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 211GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 86 64 66 64 64 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 4x16GB 222 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM RAM Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	223% Outstanding	MC Read 81.5 MC Write 108 MC Mixed 93.3 270% 94.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 26.4 SC Mixed 11.7 45% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 223% Great: 223%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	21x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $88Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $350