Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory55.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit 色彩, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime9.3 Days
Run DateJul 10 '22 at 12:46
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 5320
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.2% Very good
Memory 67
1-Core 98.6
2-Core 219
70% 128 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 897
78% 666 Pts
64-Core 1,346
83% 1,346 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Tesla T4
Nvidia(10DE 12A2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 15GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.9% Above average
Lighting 60.7
Reflection 72.9
Parallax 74.5
50% 69.4 fps
MRender 71.8
Gravity 60.8
Splatting 65.2
54% 65.9 fps
Poor: 60%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 215GB
109GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2259
Write 2,323
Mixed 2,228
508% 2,270 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 12.9
4K Mixed 41.1
139% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 130
97% 127 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 64%
Qemu HARDDISK 322GB
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 86 64 66 64 64 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
223% Outstanding
MC Read 81.5
MC Write 108
MC Mixed 93.3
270% 94.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 11.7
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 223%
Great: 223%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback