Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics79.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '22 at 18:43
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$116
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 80.8
1-Core 79.6
2-Core 210
69% 124 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 714
72% 586 Pts
64-Core 924
57% 924 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.7% Very good
Lighting 98.5
Reflection 110
Parallax 97.9
80% 102 fps
MRender 94.3
Gravity 96.5
Splatting 96.6
79% 95.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU635 240GB-$20
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N181017a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 415 405 191 24 43 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 454
Write 410
Mixed 368
SusWrite 250
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 37.7
139% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 81.6
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 126
113% 165 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 97%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB
399GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 84 85 85 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 83.8
Write 85
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 84.8
104% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 44%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
11GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 5.8 8.8 8.4 8.8 8.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
5.82% Terrible
Read 20.9
Write 8.7
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 7.5
14% 11.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
22% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.82%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905625-062.A00G 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 43.8
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 42.1
123% 43.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 22.1
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 111%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback