Today's hottest deals

Asrock P5B-DE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive30.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (98%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock P5B-DE  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '22 at 06:34
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 98%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium D 3.40GHz
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Memory 61.5
1-Core 29.6
2-Core 60.5
34% 50.5 Pts
4-Core 58
8-Core 52.5
8% 55.2 Pts
64-Core 57.3
4% 57.3 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
6.09% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 6.8
6% 7.8 fps
MRender 9.8
Gravity 8.2
Splatting 7
7% 8.33 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.09%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03070103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 76 72 68 76 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.9% Below average
Read 182
Write 64.2
Mixed 132
SusWrite 73.1
25% 113 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 31.6
4K Mixed 21.1
53% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 26
DQ Write 50.2
DQ Mixed 5.2
13% 27.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 100%
Adata HV620S 1TB
806GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 17 14 18 31 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 24.1
Write 23.6
Mixed 0.8
SusWrite 20.1
12% 17.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.9
122% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 4.1
13% 4.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 4
11% 3.83 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5B-DE Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock P5B-DE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $75
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback