Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics86% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210306
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJul 12 '22 at 04:12
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$130
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 77.4
1-Core 168
2-Core 269
94% 171 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 966
93% 765 Pts
64-Core 1,146
71% 1,146 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$200
MSI(1462 3303) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2027 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 510.06
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
86% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 115
Parallax 105
88% 109 fps
MRender 96.5
Gravity 104
Splatting 100
82% 100 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
251GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 487
Write 447
Mixed 395
99% 443 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 56.4
188% 64.9 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
151% 203 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate ST3000DM003-1F216N 3TB
280GB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 84 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 86.2
Write 65.1
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 86.6
54% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
95% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 99%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$88
347GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 103 106 108 107 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 109
Write 92.7
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 106
67% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GB-$35
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
66.7% Good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 26
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 25.3
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,871 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $888
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback