Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 52% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP EliteBook 8770w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176C
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120706
Uptime40.3 Days
Run DateJul 18 '22 at 23:54
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 34%
CPU Throttled 52%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41.6% Average
Memory 64.4
1-Core 33.3
2-Core 52.5
35% 50.1 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 144
16% 124 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro M4000
HP(103C 176C) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
7.1% Terrible
Lighting 8.6
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 12.4
7% 11.3 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 9.1
Splatting 8.4
7% 8.97 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.1%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3H01103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 371 365 376 359 368 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 449
Write 368
Mixed 106
SusWrite 354
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 33.2
4K Mixed 11.6
54% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 51.1
66% 119 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
44.5% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.6
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 576 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback