Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '22 at 03:33
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$358
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 71.3
1-Core 104
2-Core 93.3
58% 89.6 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 123
30% 200 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 511.79
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
108% Outstanding
Lighting 79.1
Reflection 112
Parallax 251
64% 147 fps
MRender 300
Gravity 259
Splatting 197
200% 252 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 108%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX950 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$132
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SS0411B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1148 1077 1008 1128 1505 1664 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 1,995
Write 1,230
Mixed 222
SusWrite 1,255
260% 1,175 MB/s
4K Read 63.6
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 77.6
261% 87.9 MB/s
DQ Read 867
DQ Write 530
DQ Mixed 586
467% 661 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 269%
Great: 379%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 997GB
332GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 393 406 404 456 462 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 456
Mixed 437
SusWrite 421
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 95.8
4K Mixed 59
195% 66.7 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 216
162% 218 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 117%
Great: 134%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 217 217 219 218 215 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 109%
Hitachi HDS5C1010CLA382 1TB
870GB free
Firmware: JC4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 110 109 110 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 112
Write 113
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 110
72% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2Z3600C18 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
47.3% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 21.1
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 10.7
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 98.4
41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS PRO WIFI Builds (Compare 2,289 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 162%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI - $274

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,261
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback