Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte X399 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF  (all builds)
Memory52.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181001
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJul 23 '22 at 00:34
Run Duration328 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 65.2
1-Core 129
2-Core 256
80% 150 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 972
88% 740 Pts
64-Core 2,167
134% 2,167 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$397
Zotac(19DA 1630) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 162
Parallax 151
138% 161 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 132
Splatting 111
111% 140 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 123%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
256GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 255 331 361 368 241 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 490
Write 428
Mixed 366
SusWrite 316
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 30.1
109% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 187
164% 249 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 117%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$62
59GB free
Firmware: S0118C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,505
Write 1,678
Mixed 852
369% 1,678 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 36.5
122% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 77.2
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 152
118% 155 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 311%
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$74
67GB free
Firmware: R0126A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 254 255 255 253 257 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 492
Write 202
Mixed 216
SusWrite 255
64% 291 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 29.6
96% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 103
87% 125 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 118%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$95
271GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 112 114 113 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 144
Write 152
Mixed 20
SusWrite 113
77% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
179% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 107%
WD WD30NPRZ-00YRMT0 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 111 115 112 112 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 135
Write 67
Mixed 71
SusWrite 112
71% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 71%
Adata HM900 4TB
746GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 139 138 138 138 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 101
Write 124
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 138
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.6
287% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 100%
ADATA NH03 2TB
434GB free, PID a03a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 70 68 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 59.3
Write 27.5
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 71.4
61% 46.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
24% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 62%
ADATA HM800 6TB
2.5TB free, PID a92a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 137 143 147 141 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 106
Write 100
Mixed 55
SusWrite 140
136% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
192% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 2OZ DDR4 3200 2OZ DDR4 3200 DDR4 3200 64GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
131% Outstanding
MC Read 54.3
MC Write 47.3
MC Mixed 53.9
148% 51.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 20.9
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 131%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,267
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback