Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16W1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMicro-Star GF65 Thin 9SEXR
MotherboardMSI MS-16W1  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '22 at 09:34
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 62.9
2-Core 141
60% 98.1 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 230
27% 210 Pts
64-Core 243
15% 243 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 12AA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7584
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.54% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 40
Parallax 3.8
4% 16.1 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 4.9
3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.54%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40znv512g KIOXIA 512GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AEXA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 326 468 556 811 351 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 1,234
Write 132
Mixed 1,087
SusWrite 486
163% 735 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 59.2
197% 66.4 MB/s
DQ Read 410
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 332
246% 329 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 155%
Great: 213%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-VK 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.1% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 18.6
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 15.1
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16W1 Builds (Compare 4,934 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI MS-16W1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback