Today's hottest deals

Asus P5P43TD/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P5P43TD/USB3  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '22 at 13:22
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8300-$131
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Memory 74.7
1-Core 39.5
2-Core 78.9
43% 64.4 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 158
21% 157 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600
Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB
CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.03% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 1.1
3% 3.4 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 4
Splatting 3
3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.03%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force GS 128GB-$150
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.05A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 80 79 79 66 40 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53% Above average
Read 194
Write 211
Mixed 173
SusWrite 70.3
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 35.3
123% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 35
DQ Write 85.9
DQ Mixed 40.5
37% 53.8 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 53%
Great: 86%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$99
912GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 80 81 82 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 78.8
Write 77.5
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 80.7
54% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.2% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 7
21% 7.43 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 91.1
44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5P43TD/USB3 Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5P43TD/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback