Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME B450M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B450M-K  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 29 '22 at 13:48
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$127
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 72.2
1-Core 107
2-Core 208
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 679
65% 535 Pts
64-Core 1,119
69% 1,119 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Lighting 69.3
Reflection 73.4
Parallax 65.3
56% 69.3 fps
MRender 68.1
Gravity 66.6
Splatting 57.5
52% 64.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0A- 240GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 55 22 0.8 0.5 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 301
Write 69.1
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 33.7
25% 116 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 20.1
4K Mixed 11.3
44% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 37.6
DQ Write 2.1
DQ Mixed 2.2
6% 14 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 54%
Samsung PSSD T7 1TB
420GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 329 339 336 336 332 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 306
Write 337
Mixed 307
SusWrite 334
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 25.7
80% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 93.4
77% 109 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 91%
WD WDS120G2G0B- 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: UI51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 117 98 41 41 60 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 85%
SanDisk Cruzer Facet 8GB
7GB free, PID 5576
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 4.6 3.9 3.9 4 4.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 35.2
Write 5.7
Mixed 8.9
SusWrite 4.2
13% 13.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.4
138% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C17 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.7% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 26
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 22.2
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 96.4
42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B450M-K Builds (Compare 3,893 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B450M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 116% - Outstanding Total price: $285
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback