Asus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210427
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 30 '22 at 16:03
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400-$119
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 153
2-Core 302
100% 183 Pts
4-Core 561
8-Core 910
90% 736 Pts
64-Core 1,123
70% 1,123 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 99%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Asus(1043 8827) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 163
Parallax 156
138% 163 fps
MRender 171
Gravity 126
Splatting 109
108% 135 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 122%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,606
Write 2,309
Mixed 1,492
474% 2,136 MB/s
4K Read 53.6
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 71
236% 81.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,142
DQ Write 853
DQ Mixed 967
731% 987 MB/s
Poor: 175% Great: 370%
USB30 250GB
50GB free
Firmware: 0405
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 314 313 312 225 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 356
Write 365
Mixed 335
SusWrite 276
75% 333 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 29.2
94% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 158
117% 154 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 42.8
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 36.3
114% 39.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 41.8
SC Mixed 32.6
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 61.1
66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 109%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 4,372 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $442
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback