HP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3048h
Memory12 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20151019
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 30 '22 at 20:45
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5500
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
42.4% Average
Memory 70
1-Core 43.1
2-Core 86
43% 66.4 Pts
4-Core 88.8
8-Core 85.2
12% 87 Pts
64-Core 81.3
5% 81.3 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600
HP(103C 094B) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.45% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 4.6
3% 4.7 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 5
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.45%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900T13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 169 181 191 192 204 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.7% Average
Read 139
Write 97.4
Mixed 93.9
SusWrite 186
29% 129 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 25.8
4K Mixed 25
76% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 90.7
DQ Mixed 102
78% 106 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 96%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA641 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: MKAOA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 132 138 141 140 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 143
Write 144
Mixed 75
SusWrite 138
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:00 00 ID:00 00 ID:00 00 ID:00 00 52GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 4.2
13% 4.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.7
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 442 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback