bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1637 x 1615 - 32 Bit colors, , , 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200807
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 04 '22 at 13:03
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.9% Good
Memory 64.6
1-Core 104
2-Core 208
69% 126 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 392
52% 389 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID T4-1B
Nvidia(10DE 1309) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 462.31
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
53.7% Above average
Lighting 76.5
Reflection 79
Parallax 72
62% 75.8 fps
MRender 45
Gravity 45
Splatting 45
37% 45 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Citrix Virtual Disk 107GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PVS
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,341
Write 98.2
Mixed 1,351
205% 930 MB/s
4K Read 108
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 85.2
314% 90.3 MB/s
DQ Read 705
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 456
350% 486 MB/s
Vmware Virtual disk 27GB
14GB free
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 256
Write 87
Mixed 141
121% 162 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 4.5
820% 4.77 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
43.3% Average
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 16.3
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 4.7
14% 4.73 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback