Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A68M-DG3+  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190218
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateAug 04 '22 at 15:45
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
31.1% Below average
Memory 48.3
1-Core 58
2-Core 85.7
39% 64 Pts
4-Core 80.8
8-Core 87
11% 83.9 Pts
64-Core 77.4
5% 77.4 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
ASRock(1849 1315) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
3.07% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 4
Parallax 6.6
3% 4.87 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 6.1
3% 2.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.07%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XD0R0241
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 195 140 92 175 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 305
Write 281
Mixed 247
SusWrite 150
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 23.4
78% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 72.9
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 108
82% 108 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SKIKOTAR-8GB-1600 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.2% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 8.1
22% 7.83 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.4
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 167
24% 167 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A68M-DG3+ Builds (Compare 556 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback