Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80XS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 80XS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170713
Uptime16.7 Days
Run DateAug 05 '22 at 09:08
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
44.8% Average
Memory 62.6
1-Core 66
2-Core 100
47% 76.2 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 156
21% 158 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Legend(17AA 39C1) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
3.47% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 5.7
3% 5.8 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 6.9
5% 6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.47%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$29
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 177 114 51 106 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 345
Write 296
Mixed 263
SusWrite 102
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 12.9
4K Mixed 13.6
63% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 14.3
DQ Mixed 24.5
32% 60.7 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$40
489GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 63 66 65 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 66.9
Write 67
Mixed 42.4
SusWrite 64.2
44% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 8GB
1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
28.4% Poor
MC Read 12
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 11.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 7.7
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80XS Builds (Compare 324 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80XS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $220Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback