Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive364% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210629
Uptime21.3 Days
Run DateAug 08 '22 at 01:57
Run Duration300 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$155
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
95% Outstanding
Memory 76.7
1-Core 176
2-Core 352
105% 201 Pts
4-Core 606
8-Core 1,143
104% 874 Pts
64-Core 1599
99% 1599 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 95%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$282
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 120
Parallax 126
111% 128 fps
MRender 145
Gravity 106
Splatting 90.8
90% 114 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$110
299GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3262 1520 881 877 888 890 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
364% Outstanding
Read 2935
Write 3,327
Mixed 2,974
SusWrite 1,386
598% 2,656 MB/s
4K Read 79.4
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 109
356% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,277
DQ Write 1,017
DQ Mixed 1,128
849% 1,141 MB/s
Poor: 210%
This bench: 364%
Great: 429%
Asmt 2115 1TB
717GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 381 381 380 381 381 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 408
Write 384
Mixed 375
SusWrite 381
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 62
4K Mixed 42.8
139% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 166
125% 166 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 76%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 193 181 192 182 183 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 76% Great: 136%
WD My Passport 2627 5TB
3.5TB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 115 115 116 115 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 128
Write 110
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 114
141% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.8
213% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.2% Good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 25.6
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 26.3
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 87
46% 87 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 18,290 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $800
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback