Gigabyte Z490 AORUS ELITE AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics43.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive287% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte Z490 AORUS ELITE AC  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '22 at 07:47
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10600-$139
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 90.8
1-Core 134
2-Core 267
91% 164 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 841
82% 672 Pts
64-Core 1,057
65% 1,057 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1F82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.9% Average
Lighting 54.7
Reflection 56
Parallax 51.4
45% 54 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 49.4
Splatting 45
42% 53 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
536GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1563 1840 1850 1976 1877 1447 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 1,532
Write 2,010
Mixed 1,701
SusWrite 1,759
397% 1,750 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 74.3
251% 88.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,133
DQ Write 673
DQ Mixed 861
652% 889 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 287%
Great: 365%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
829GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 13 13 8.9 14 36 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
1.63% Terrible
Read 10
Write 9.5
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 18.5
3% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
0% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 1.63%
Great: 121%
Seagate Ultra Touch HDD 1TB
383GB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 27 23 28 40 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 10.7
Write 30.3
Mixed 16.9
SusWrite 30.1
16% 22 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
23% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.2% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 20
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 21.7
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 66.1
61% 66.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z490 AORUS ELITE AC Builds (Compare 3,634 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z490 AORUS ELITE AC - $241

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,113
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback