Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H61M-S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-S1  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120730
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '22 at 14:20
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$100
Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-2120 CPU @ 3.30GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 77.9
1-Core 74
2-Core 132
58% 94.6 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 214
28% 213 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Sapphire(174B 174B) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 18.2
Parallax 14.3
13% 16.3 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 10.2
9% 11.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2107XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 100 143 85 155 55 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.6% Below average
Read 119
Write 129
Mixed 120
SusWrite 111
27% 120 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 22
73% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 21.3
DQ Write 36.4
DQ Mixed 11.8
14% 23.2 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 93%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 155 155 155 156 155 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 140
Write 137
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 155
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
214% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
50.8% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H61M-S1 Builds (Compare 2,525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-S1 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $294
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback