Today's hottest deals

HP ZBook 17 G4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ZBook 17 G4  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8270
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '22 at 20:18
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 90.6
2-Core 169
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 461
46% 377 Pts
64-Core 508
31% 508 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
HP(103C 8270) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
5.83% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 7.6
5% 10.8 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 10.3
7% 8.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.83%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK62B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 123 171 109 119 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 386
Write 140
Mixed 173
SusWrite 123
45% 205 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 8.2
49% 12.5 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 91%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$32
661GB free
Firmware: AX0P2D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 55 74 80 56 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 60.5
Write 56.9
Mixed 30.4
SusWrite 69.3
40% 54.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
80% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 - [0x9B85] CT8G4SFS824A.M8FD Kingston HP26D4S9S8HJ-8 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.2% Good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 21.1
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 15.4
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook 17 G4 Builds (Compare 596 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 17 G4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback