Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PH315-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Covini_CFS
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190902
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '22 at 21:51
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 92.2
1-Core 125
2-Core 253
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 762
74% 608 Pts
64-Core 970
60% 970 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1343) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.24% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 98.2
Parallax 8.2
6% 37.8 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 7.6
Splatting 0.2
4% 6.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.24%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
434GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2020 812 829 830 785 832 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 1,740
Write 2,267
Mixed 1,430
SusWrite 1018
364% 1,614 MB/s
4K Read 51.1
4K Write 98.8
4K Mixed 66.8
215% 72.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,161
DQ Write 880
DQ Mixed 985
746% 1,009 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 244%
Great: 296%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 23.3
84% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 25.6
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH315-52 Builds (Compare 4,097 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback