HP Laptop 15-bs1xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15-bs1xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 832A
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190304
Uptime20.1 Days
Run DateAug 10 '22 at 04:54
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 70.7
1-Core 62.3
2-Core 159
56% 97.3 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 334
40% 311 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
HP(103C 832A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
5.51% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 6.9
5% 5.63 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 10
7% 8.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.51%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 SSD 128GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0817A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 73 138 86 106 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 395
Write 413
Mixed 328
SusWrite 140
72% 319 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
40% 9.17 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: RDM4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 131 132 130 131 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 114
Write 127
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 130
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.7% Above average
MC Read 24
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 18.3
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 18.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 99.8
40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15-bs1xx Builds (Compare 2,181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-bs1xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback