Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive82% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '22 at 10:20
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$95
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 68.3
2-Core 130
58% 94 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 359
35% 288 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) 2GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 23.5
Parallax 21
13% 20.1 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 17
Splatting 17.7
14% 16.3 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 500G 500GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 155 99 121 144 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 479
Write 438
Mixed 226
SusWrite 132
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 40.7
139% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 208
170% 244 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82%
Great: 116%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
870GB free
Firmware: SC12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 175 175 175 176 177 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 168
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 175
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2133C11D3/4GX F3-12800CL9-4GBXL KHX2133C11D3/4GX F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.4% Average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 16.2
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.6
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $249
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback