Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Gaming FX505DY_FX505DY

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DY_FX505DY  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DY
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '22 at 17:21
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Memory 33.5
1-Core 67.5
2-Core 130
41% 76.9 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 381
38% 312 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 17C1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 19.20.36.04
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.13% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 24.2
Parallax 19.1
2% 15.3 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.13%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Bc511 NVMe SK hynix 256GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11001101 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 561 319 306 314 314 315 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 779
Write 590
Mixed 605
SusWrite 355
130% 582 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 68.1
4K Mixed 33.5
129% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 560
DQ Write 542
DQ Mixed 596
435% 566 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 117%
Great: 177%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: SDM4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 127 125 129 129 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66% Good
Read 103
Write 129
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 127
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 66%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
34.3% Below average
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 20.9
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 9.4
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 235
17% 235 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DY_FX505DY Builds (Compare 600 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DY_FX505DY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback