Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190823
Uptime10.1 Days
Run DateAug 10 '22 at 18:32
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 78.8
1-Core 135
2-Core 268
87% 161 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 765
80% 645 Pts
64-Core 709
44% 709 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
Gigabyte(1458 230F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 87.8
Parallax 68.9
0% 52.3 fps
MRender 59.7
Gravity 62.2
Splatting 43.1
44% 55 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 480GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X02c08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 108 94 121 149 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 343
Write 188
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 99.9
35% 159 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
40% 8.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$36
231GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 155 158 157 159 156 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 97.2
Write 101
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 157
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
52.5% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 17.9
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 17.2
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,999 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback