Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory15.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 11 '22 at 09:20
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 63.6
1-Core 125
2-Core 244
79% 144 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 796
77% 615 Pts
64-Core 1,248
84% 1,248 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$290
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.9% Above average
Lighting 62.6
Reflection 67.2
Parallax 60.7
51% 63.5 fps
MRender 60.3
Gravity 64.1
Splatting 60.5
51% 61.6 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 61%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel 545s Series 256GB-$79
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHF002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 188 229 165 134 165 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 418
Write 394
Mixed 402
SusWrite 190
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 34.6
120% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 151
126% 182 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 117%
Adata SX8200PNP 2TB
634GB free
Firmware: SS0411BB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1439 969 1181 938 983 976 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 2,177
Write 1,658
Mixed 138
SusWrite 1,081
280% 1,264 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 59.8
200% 69.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,012
DQ Write 686
DQ Mixed 596
513% 765 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 253%
Great: 370%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$80
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 192 195 201 200 201 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 205
Write 161
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 195
108% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST10000VN0008-2JJ101 10TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 217 222 221 222 219 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 90%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE BLS8G4D32AESCK.M8FE1 BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE BLS8G4D32AESCK.M8FE1 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.5% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 26.8
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 22.9
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 11 108 4 60 27" 1920 1080 VSC502F VX2756 SERIES
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 17,120 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $203

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $1,121
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $278Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $450Crucial MX500 250GB $38
Intel Core i5-12400F $170Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $399Nvidia RTX 3050 $300Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $54SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $453SanDisk Extreme 16GB $17
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback