Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '22 at 10:44
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 78.9
1-Core 111
2-Core 233
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 644
69% 549 Pts
64-Core 902
56% 902 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.7.1
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53% Above average
Lighting 66.6
Reflection 65.7
Parallax 89.5
54% 73.9 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 74.9
Splatting 48.8
50% 63.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
895GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 394 408 387 45 205 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 446
Write 396
Mixed 362
SusWrite 299
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 82
4K Mixed 20
108% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 23.6
DQ Mixed 0.3
21% 54.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 100%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
27GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 36 14 13 13 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 155
Write 31.9
Mixed 61.3
SusWrite 25
73% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 3.3
211% 4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 36%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
22GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 31 42 36 26 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 133
Write 27.7
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 31.9
63% 59 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 2.7
207% 4.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 45.3
MC Write 42
MC Mixed 36.6
118% 41.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 39.1
SC Mixed 30.9
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 4,043 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $270
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback