Today's hottest deals

Asus H97M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '22 at 19:01
Run Duration283 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 87.8
1-Core 120
2-Core 234
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 600
62% 498 Pts
64-Core 566
35% 566 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
Asus(1043 047E) 3GB
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
30.6% Below average
Lighting 42.4
Reflection 18.8
Parallax 48.3
35% 36.5 fps
MRender 28
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 21.4
23% 28.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4004RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 404
Write 374
Mixed 304
80% 360 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 16
72% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 99.2
DQ Write 99.3
DQ Mixed 29.1
41% 75.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$34
809GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 205 206 208 208 206 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 204
Write 158
Mixed 75
SusWrite 206
117% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 118%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.2% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 8.8
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.5
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,025 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-PLUS - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $324
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback