Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics85.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-F  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 11 '22 at 20:20
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Memory 79.4
1-Core 152
2-Core 305
96% 179 Pts
4-Core 596
8-Core 934
94% 765 Pts
64-Core 1,134
70% 1,134 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$245
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.7.1
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.6% Excellent
Lighting 86.6
Reflection 133
Parallax 164
71% 128 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 88.7
Splatting 144
115% 141 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 93%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 99 63 70 97 38 MB/s
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
71.3% Very good
Read 268
Write 113
Mixed 246
SusWrite 109
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 36.9
142% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 43.7
84% 170 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 90%
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
108GB free
Firmware: S190802a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 180 180 181 197 179 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
64% Good
Read 489
Write 472
Mixed 407
SusWrite 183
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 11.5
102% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 11.7
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 29.7
42% 71 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 64%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 32.5
104% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 29.6
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 33.1
100% 34.9 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-F Builds (Compare 559 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback