Today's hottest deals

MSI A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics9.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7721
MotherboardMSI A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721)  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160810
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 13 '22 at 23:21
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6400K APU-$81
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Memory 58.9
1-Core 63.1
2-Core 90.5
44% 70.8 Pts
4-Core 92.5
8-Core 94.2
12% 93.3 Pts
64-Core 93.6
6% 93.6 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5770
Sapphire(174B 1482) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
9.3% Terrible
Lighting 14.5
Reflection 13.9
Parallax 6.6
12% 11.7 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 4.8
4% 5.47 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.3%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37 120GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 247 92 25 61 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 412
Write 341
Mixed 308
SusWrite 127
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 9.6
76% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 16.7
41% 85.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 77%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$88
255GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 90 88 87 88 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 81
Write 65.7
Mixed 45.6
SusWrite 88.1
51% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905584-029.A00LF PSD34G16002 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.1% Poor
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 9.3
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 9.2
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721) Builds (Compare 1,095 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback