Notebook V15x_V17xPNKPNJPNH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics2.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 85% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemNotebook V15x_V17xPNKPNJPNH  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook V15x_V17xPNKPNJPNH
Memory55.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220215
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateAug 14 '22 at 14:00
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 85%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Memory 72.2
1-Core 189
2-Core 353
107% 205 Pts
4-Core 648
8-Core 999
102% 824 Pts
64-Core 1,504
93% 1,504 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Clevo(1558 0156) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.77% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 77.9
Parallax 3.7
2% 28.1 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 3.8
4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 2.77%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS2000G 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8442105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 925 686 595 557 623 189 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1150
Write 1,324
Mixed 919
SusWrite 596
224% 997 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 20
185% 83.2 MB/s
DQ Read 874
DQ Write 1029
DQ Mixed 543
523% 816 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 177%
Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G4SFD832A.M16FE 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 40
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 37.9
112% 39.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 43
SC Mixed 30.6
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 96.4
42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical V15x_V17xPNKPNJPNH Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

System: Notebook V15x_V17xPNKPNJPNH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback