Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '22 at 19:10
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 67.8
1-Core 111
2-Core 218
72% 132 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 460
62% 460 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
ASRock(1849 5026) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.8% Average
Lighting 54.2
Reflection 58.7
Parallax 77.4
44% 63.4 fps
MRender 59.2
Gravity 59.4
Splatting 43.3
43% 54 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Midasforce 120GB 120GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0326A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 42 66 65 39 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 371
Write 109
Mixed 150
SusWrite 53.7
37% 171 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 27.4
4K Mixed 0.4
55% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 51.9
DQ Write 96.4
DQ Mixed 15.5
28% 54.6 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
401GB free
Firmware: CC63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 150 150 150 152 149 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 145
Write 79.4
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 150
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 88%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$79
153GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 115 116 117 117 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 147
Write 130
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 116
74% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$69
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
89.4% Excellent
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 30.7
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 25.1
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,247 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback