Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire TC-605

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-605  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-605
Memory4.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140321
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '22 at 01:57
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$185
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 184
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 355
47% 354 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Acer(1025 0750) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.5180
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.11% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 6.4
3% 4.13 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.11%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HDWD105 500GB-$49
448GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 168 163 168 163 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 177
Mixed 31
SusWrite 168
103% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
134% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
25GB free, PID 4300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 7.2 7.2 6.6 7.8 7.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 14.8
Write 5.7
SusWrite 7.2
10% 9.23 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.1
44% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KFG/4G 0215 CM3X2G1600C8 6GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.8% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-605 Builds (Compare 1,014 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-605

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $234
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback