Today's hottest deals

Asrock M3A770DE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock M3A770DE  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1400 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '22 at 17:47
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 840-$150
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 73.8
1-Core 52.5
2-Core 106
48% 77.4 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 213
28% 213 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTS
EVGA(3842 C829) 640MB
Ram: 640MB, Driver: 341.95
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
4.94% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 9.9
Parallax 2.6
5% 6.33 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 3.5
4% 5.43 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.94%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 149 146 146 146 146 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.6% Above average
Read 240
Write 220
Mixed 206
SusWrite 156
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 23.9
87% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 84.9
DQ Mixed 100
76% 103 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.9% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.43 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 7.3
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M3A770DE Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock M3A770DE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback