Today's hottest deals

Amazon g4dn.xlarge

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics76.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAmazon g4dn.xlarge  (all builds)
MotherboardAmazon
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '22 at 09:52
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8259CL
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 68
1-Core 90
2-Core 158
61% 105 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 244
34% 249 Pts
64-Core 254
16% 254 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Tesla T4
Nvidia(10DE 12A2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 15GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
76.8% Very good
Lighting 90.6
Reflection 117
Parallax 103
74% 103 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 90.4
Splatting 99.1
82% 101 fps
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 80%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 275GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.7 6.4 6.6 6.4 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
8.72% Terrible
Read 12.7
Write 6.2
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 17.7
11% 14 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
30% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.72%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.1% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 11.5
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 6.9
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical g4dn.xlarge Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Amazon g4dn.xlarge

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback