Today's hottest deals

Acer Nitro AN515-54

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-54  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Octavia_CFS
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '22 at 08:49
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 220
83% 144 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 528
52% 425 Pts
64-Core 507
31% 507 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1331) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.03% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 47.4
Parallax 8.8
4% 20.5 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 9.5
6% 7.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.03%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
787GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JU001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 105 109 109 99 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 67.7
Write 102
Mixed 47.3
SusWrite 105
59% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.8
217% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 79%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
20GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 9.5 9 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 158
Write 10.7
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 10.2
40% 48 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
42% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
45% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 12
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 11.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-54 Builds (Compare 12,294 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback