Today's hottest deals

Asus N550JK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive80.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus N550JK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N550JK
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140926
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateAug 20 '22 at 06:56
Run Duration306 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
62% Good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 82.4
2-Core 134
62% 100 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 306
33% 265 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 850M
Asus(1043 11CD) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1165
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
8.02% Terrible
Lighting 9.8
Reflection 12.3
Parallax 5.5
8% 9.2 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 13.2
8% 9.37 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 8.02%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
389GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 169 269 73 47 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 453
Write 428
Mixed 383
SusWrite 164
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 60.8
4K Mixed 40
133% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 140
132% 206 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 19.3
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N550JK Builds (Compare 841 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N550JK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $450
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback