Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 14-ck0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Laptop 14-ck0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 849A
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190620
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateAug 24 '22 at 19:26
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7020U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 82.5
1-Core 69.8
2-Core 124
57% 92.3 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 186
26% 189 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 849A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8853
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
3.05% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 4.7
3% 3.6 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 0.1
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.05%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
871GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 37 22 36 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 38.2
Write 75.7
Mixed 34
SusWrite 49.3
36% 49.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 0.7
238% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
36.3% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 10.2
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 11.3
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 14-ck0xxx Builds (Compare 690 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14-ck0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback