Today's hottest deals

Asrock X570 AQUA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 154%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 158%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics184% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X570 AQUA  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210421
Uptime14.5 Days
Run DateAug 25 '22 at 00:23
Run Duration293 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$486
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 67.9
1-Core 146
2-Core 291
89% 168 Pts
4-Core 553
8-Core 894
89% 724 Pts
64-Core 1,491
92% 1,491 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
PowerColor(148C 2414) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 27.20.21002.112
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
184% Outstanding
Lighting 225
Reflection 256
Parallax 550
183% 344 fps
MRender 398
Gravity 206
Splatting 300
245% 302 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 184%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
460GB free
Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,270
Write 3,476
Mixed 2,169
593% 2,638 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 82
273% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,085
DQ Write 1,090
DQ Mixed 1,091
819% 1,089 MB/s
Poor: 189% Great: 486%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
716GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1522 887 872 859 885 887 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 1,960
Write 3,410
Mixed 2,180
SusWrite 986
483% 2,134 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 78.5
258% 98.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,008
DQ Write 960
DQ Mixed 1,008
750% 992 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 263%
Great: 486%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$82
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 173 188 190 192 186 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX4M4C3600C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
67.2% Good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 26.6
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 26.3
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 AQUA Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 194%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 232%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 AQUA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,458
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback