Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite M840

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemToshiba Satellite M840  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120301
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 26 '22 at 08:04
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3612QM
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 76.1
1-Core 78.9
2-Core 156
61% 104 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 393
43% 339 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600M
Toshiba(1179 FB81) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
2.9% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 3.5
3% 3.67 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 3
2% 3.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.9%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 256GB SSD 256GB
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 287 269 268 275 274 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 285
Write 257
Mixed 252
SusWrite 276
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 22.2
4K Mixed 19.3
63% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 23.5
DQ Write 55.9
DQ Mixed 27.6
24% 35.7 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 240%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
560GB free
Firmware: AX002M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 86 74 67 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 75.4
Write 89.7
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 77.3
50% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 Adata AM1L16BC8R2-B1QS 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite M840 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite M840

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback