Today's hottest deals

HP Victus by HP Laptop 16-e0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Victus by HP Laptop 16-e0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8934
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210914
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateAug 27 '22 at 01:07
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 69.6
1-Core 120
2-Core 217
75% 136 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 476
53% 416 Pts
64-Core 668
41% 668 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
HP(103C 8934) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.14026.1
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 52.7
Parallax 27.5
16% 33.3 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 21.2
Splatting 20
15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G-1006 512GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 131 136 157 376 416 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 813
Write 92.4
Mixed 286
SusWrite 230
77% 355 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 46.4
169% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,059
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 206
268% 505 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 128%
Great: 268%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-XN 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.3% Very good
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 27.7
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 21.2
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Victus by HP Laptop 16-e0xxx Builds (Compare 2,077 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: HP Victus by HP Laptop 16-e0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback