Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics90.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 28 '22 at 07:37
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 65.8
1-Core 134
2-Core 260
82% 153 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 777
76% 621 Pts
64-Core 1,038
64% 1,038 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 110
Parallax 182
95% 136 fps
MRender 92.5
Gravity 136
Splatting 76.3
81% 102 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 123 127 131 131 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 414
Write 133
Mixed 130
SusWrite 124
44% 200 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 91.9
4K Mixed 20.4
113% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 48.3
77% 152 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 73%
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
31GB free
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 146 77 42 54 41 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 490
Write 435
Mixed 400
SusWrite 132
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 31.5
149% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 47.7
101% 201 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 85%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 11.2
Mixed 1
4% 6.1 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.3
8% 0.15 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 55%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$15
51GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 12 19 14 15 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 101
Write 107
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 14.9
52% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 60%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$69
186GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 84 76 89 67 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 90
Write 97.6
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 80.1
60% 82 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
69.2% Good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 27.1
72% 25 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 25.5
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,208 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 132% - Outstanding Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback