Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EAU_R565EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive154% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EAU_R565EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515EAU
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210813
Uptime1 Days
Run DateAug 31 '22 at 03:27
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 73.3
1-Core 149
2-Core 287
91% 170 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 658
74% 581 Pts
64-Core 658
41% 658 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 1B72) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9929
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 19.1
Reflection 23.2
Parallax 24.6
16% 22.3 fps
MRender 20.4
Gravity 28
Splatting 1
12% 16.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21106000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 281 219 219 219 219 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1,232
Write 921
Mixed 885
SusWrite 240
182% 819 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 60.3
216% 78.4 MB/s
DQ Read 662
DQ Write 396
DQ Mixed 568
413% 542 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 154%
Great: 171%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE M471A5244BB0-CWE 8GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.7% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 21.6
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 18.8
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 94.1
42% 94.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EAU_R565EA Builds (Compare 259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EAU_R565EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback