Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-S2V  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '22 at 09:12
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 99.9
2-Core 181
74% 124 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 352
48% 355 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 855A) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 359.06
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.4% Below average
Lighting 41.7
Reflection 43.5
Parallax 37.9
34% 41 fps
MRender 36.4
Gravity 38
Splatting 33.8
29% 36.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3G37R5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 425
Write 399
Mixed 211
76% 345 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 45.6
168% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 118
115% 186 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 88%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$104
155GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 478 483 485 487 487 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 460
Mixed 443
SusWrite 481
107% 476 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 73.4
248% 88.3 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 364
273% 363 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 143%
Great: 137%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
163GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 68 68 69 70 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
40% Average
Read 70.9
Write 66.3
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 68.1
47% 63.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
38GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 60 60 60 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 84.4
Write 79.7
Mixed 54.1
SusWrite 59.8
51% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-037.A00LF 99U5471-012.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
52.5% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.1
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-S2V Builds (Compare 502 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback