bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive51.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory60.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '22 at 15:54
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8171M
None, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 68
1-Core 75.3
2-Core 151
57% 98.1 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 599
53% 448 Pts
64-Core 1201
74% 1201 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 63%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 550GB
489GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 228 235 239 205 240 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 401
Write 340
Mixed 385
SusWrite 231
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 18
4K Mixed 18
62% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 73.6
DQ Write 32.2
DQ Mixed 45.1
36% 50.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 80%
Virtual HD 137GB
118GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 141 133 133 144 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 390
Write 444
Mixed 435
SusWrite 138
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 10.9
38% 12 MB/s
DQ Read 71.8
DQ Write 71.5
DQ Mixed 70.7
53% 71.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39%
Great: 67%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 25 26 22 26 20 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 7% Great: 53%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 36 37 76 56 81 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
62% Good
Read 158
Write 81.9
Mixed 110
SusWrite 56.7
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 2.1
374% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 62%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 64GB
null MHz
1024, 32767, 31745 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
149% Outstanding
MC Read 60.2
MC Write 74.2
MC Mixed 57.3
183% 63.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 5.5
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 149%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback