Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	0.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	93.7% Outstanding	Memory 88.4 1-Core 137 2-Core 269 91% 165 Pts	4-Core 538 8-Core 740 81% 639 Pts	64-Core 788 49% 788 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 93.7% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450 66,079 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.9% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 1.5 1% 1.23 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.9 1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.9% Great: 1%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
T-force 250GB 250GB 3,095 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0430A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 480 Write 352 Mixed 389 90% 407 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 43.2 4K Mixed 36.9 122% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 363 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 108 116% 199 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 123%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB 44,506 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 411GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 181 Write 118 Mixed 82 94% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 198% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4DFS8266.C8FE 859B CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 16GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2666, 2666 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	MC Read 33.7 MC Write 32.9 MC Mixed 24.3 87% 30.3 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 32.5 SC Mixed 25 73% 25.4 GB/s	Latency 69.2 58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 88%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 99%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 74%

Battleship

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $271Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	1,006x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	827x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	607x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	374x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	319x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $55Bench 275%, 495,311 samples	318x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	495x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	491x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	229x

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $729