Today's hottest deals

Asus H81M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-E  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '22 at 14:51
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460S
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 176
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 338
46% 342 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 18.7
Parallax 21.5
18% 20.7 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 17.2
18% 22 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0510A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 88 7 186 43 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 488
Write 406
Mixed 310
SusWrite 77.1
71% 320 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 0.5
50% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 83.6
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 0.6
50% 114 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 93%
Excelstor Technology J8160S 165GB
124GB free
Firmware: P22OA70A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 67 67 66 67 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 59.4
Write 60.6
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 66.2
41% 56.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 39%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
611GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 24 25 24 25 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
21% Poor
Read 49.1
Write 22.2
Mixed 25.4
SusWrite 24
22% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 21%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX316C10F/8 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.6% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 18.3
60% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 20.3
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 73.3
54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-E Builds (Compare 1,879 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-E - $311

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $545
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback