Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte X399 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191211
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateSep 20 '22 at 01:15
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1900X-$94
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 52.7
1-Core 123
2-Core 241
73% 139 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 796
72% 604 Pts
64-Core 1251
77% 1251 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217
MSI(1462 3822) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.3.1
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.4% Above average
Lighting 65.5
Reflection 62
Parallax 92.4
53% 73.3 fps
MRender 50.7
Gravity 76.7
Splatting 40.7
44% 56 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 446 455 458 452 448 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 475
Mixed 435
SusWrite 448
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 79
4K Mixed 50.5
167% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 358
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 115%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$46
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
72.1% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 26.1
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 23.1
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback