Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80E1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 50% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 80E1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 4B2
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160118
Uptime12.1 Days
Run DateSep 24 '22 at 15:30
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 43%
CPU Throttled 50%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6410 APU R5 Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Memory 28.5
1-Core 14.4
2-Core 28.4
16% 23.8 Pts
4-Core 42.3
8-Core 47.4
6% 44.8 Pts
64-Core 50.7
3% 50.7 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
Legend(17AA 3801) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.23% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 0.9
2% 2.67 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.23%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-gen01sm21ar128sdk 128GB 128GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 25 20 49 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 339
Write 227
Mixed 219
SusWrite 41.6
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 16
4K Mixed 11.1
36% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 96.8
DQ Write 71.6
DQ Mixed 15.5
30% 61.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 86%
Mass Storage Device 256GB
212GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 49.9
Write 31.4
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 30.3
45% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 4.1
301% 6.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
RAMAXEL RMT3170MN68F9F1600 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 4.3
11% 3.87 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 2.1
8% 2.93 GB/s
Latency 264
15% 264 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80E1 Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80E1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback