Today's hottest deals

Asus B150 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus B150 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateSep 26 '22 at 22:44
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$34
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 77.3
1-Core 83.4
2-Core 181
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 267
34% 255 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1410 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.8.2
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55.3% Above average
Lighting 70.4
Reflection 64.5
Parallax 94.3
57% 76.4 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 78.8
Splatting 48.2
51% 64.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asgard AN512NVMe-M.2/80 512GB
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0614B0G Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 385 792 437 176 333 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 1,136
Write 920
Mixed 793
SusWrite 423
183% 818 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 47.1
213% 84.5 MB/s
DQ Read 902
DQ Write 766
DQ Mixed 615
520% 761 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 172%
Great: 245%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 250GB
152GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 51 51 51 52 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 48.4
Write 48.5
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 51.2
10% 46 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
2% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 109%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
279GB free
Firmware: AM002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 99 99 99 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 93.2
Write 108
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 98.1
61% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 60%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$32
183GB free
Firmware: 0002BSM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 52 54 53 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 48.2
Write 50.1
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 53.5
34% 46 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
72% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ DDR4 2666 2OZ 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.4% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 14.2
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.3
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B150 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 830 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus B150 PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $346
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback