Today's hottest deals

MSI H270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive274% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A62
MotherboardMSI H270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '17 at 01:53
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$179
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 94
1-Core 127
2-Core 254
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 702
73% 588 Pts
64-Core 701
43% 701 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$115
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 387.92
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Lighting 69.1
Reflection 68.1
Parallax 60.1
56% 65.8 fps
MRender 71.4
Gravity 66.6
Splatting 68.7
56% 68.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$215
332GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 525
Write 478
Mixed 520
113% 508 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 92.2
4K Mixed 45.2
160% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 173
172% 276 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 114%
Great: 124%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 2,786
Write 1,390
Mixed 1,423
410% 1,866 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 47.8
197% 68.9 MB/s
DQ Read 504
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 174
194% 332 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 274%
Great: 254%
Seagate ST4000DX002-1H2178 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC48 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 158
Write 32.1
Mixed 31.6
54% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.94
4K Mixed 0.32
103% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 118%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
124GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 86.5
Write 78.3
Mixed 70.1
59% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 0.62
131% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$35
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 26
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 24.7
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 59.9
67% 59.9 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) Builds (Compare 954 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI H270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $580
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback